RT Book, Section A1 Burke, Louise A1 Fahrenholtz, Ida A1 Garthe, Ina A1 Lundy, Bronwen A1 Melin, Anna A2 Burke, Louise A2 Deakin, Vicki A2 Minehan, Michelle SR Print(0) ID 1185563249 T1 Low Energy Availability: Challenges and Approaches to Measurement and Treatment T2 Clinical Sports Nutrition, 6e YR 2021 FD 2021 PB McGraw Hill Education (Australia) Pty Ltd PP New York, NY SN 9781743767900 LK accessphysiotherapy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1185563249 RD 2024/04/19 AB The past three decades have seen an evolution in our understanding of problems involved with energy deficiency in athletes. The first defining step involved the formalisation of the Female Athlete Triad syndrome by the American College of Sports Medicine in 1997 (see Figure 6.1A), with advocacy for the recognition of a common presentation and interrelationship of eating disorders, amenorrhoea and osteoporosis/bone injuries in female athletes (Otis et al. 1997). The formation of the Female Athlete Triad Coalition and further refining of the American College of Sports Medicine model in 2007 (Nattiv et al. 2007) focused awareness that each corner of the Triad involves a spectrum between health and a disease (see Figure 6.1B). Furthermore, each athlete can ‘travel’ along each continuum at different times and rates, and there is a need for concern about any movement towards ill-health, rather than waiting for a clinical diagnosis to be reached. Additional insights included an expansion of the dietary contribution to the Triad, with recognition that energy deficiency rather than an eating disorder per se creates hormonal and metabolic perturbations and can be caused by a range of scenarios. It has been more clearly articulated that the particular type of energy deficiency in the Triad is low energy availability (LEA); the particular type of reproductive disorder is functional hypothalamic menstrual disorders (hereafter known as menstrual disorder/disturbance); and the particular type of skeletal impairment is the uncoupling of bone turnover, with an increased rate of bone resorption and a reduced rate of bone formation (Loucks 2015).